![]() |
in the news |
|
Thinking of sending MT offshore? Should you think again?
How to evaluate Hospital Risk when Sending Medical Transcription Off-Shore
Margaret Davino, Esq.
About the Author: "Margaret Davino is an attorney with Kaufman, Borgeest & Ryan, with offices in New York and New Jersey, specializing in health law. She was formerly General Counsel of St. Vincent's Hospital in Manhattan, and of St. Joseph's Hospital in Paterson, New Jersey."
Hospitals are faced with multiple pressures nowadays, many of them financial. The need for hospital management to meet financial constraints often translates into a desire to contract with vendors at the lowest possible immediate cost, sometimes without thought as to the other non-price issues in a contract. It is important not to overlook some of the legal issues that may be associated with vendor contracts, especially with vendors that may subcontract out portions of their tasks. This article will discuss specifically the considerations that should be given by healthcare providers to choosing a medical transcription vendor, and various tips to protect hospitals when entering into a medical transcription contract, particularly in light of the recently effective privacy regulations, and the security regulations, of the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Medical transcription is a vital part of a hospital's operations. The need to have accurate, timely transcription of operating room reports, discharge summaries, radiology reports, etc. is essential not only for communication among healthcare providers treating patients, but also for defense of medical malpractice suits, accurate coding and billing for services, and satisfaction of regulatory requirements. Yet transmission of confidential medical information outside of hospital walls places an obligation on the Hospital to ensure that the vendor protects the confidentiality of such information, especially given the heightened focus that HIPAA places on privacy of medical information. The recent case in which a Pakistani subcontractor to a medical transcription company threatened to release information unless she was paid more illustrates how important it is for hospitals and healthcare providers to look carefully at vendors to whom medical information is sent, and to protect themselves contractually from liability for acts of the vendors or their subcontractors. The above story started with the University of California at San Francisco Medical Center forwarding a portion of its transcription work to Transcription Stat, a company it has used for two decades. This firm has fifteen subcontractors throughout the country to handle the "thousands of files a day" received from UCSF. One of those subcontractors, a woman in Florida, further subcontracted the work, to a man in Texas, Tom Spires. Allegedly unbeknownst to the other parties, Tom Spires also used subcontractors, one of whom was a Pakistani woman, Ms. Beloch. On October 7, UCSF received an e-mail from Ms. Beloch in Pakistan, stating that Spires owed her money and would not respond to her, and demanding that UCSF require Spires to pay her. She then wrote that if she was not paid, "I will expose all the voice files and patient records of UCSF . . . on the Internet." To show that she was serious, Ms. Beloch attached dictation reports from UCSF physicians regarding two patients. Although one of the parties involved ultimately paid the Pakistani subcontractor and she agreed to renege on her threat, this situation poses obvious concerns for all of the parties involved. How can a hospital best protect itself from a situation such as this? The privacy regulations of the federal HIPAA law, effective April 14, 2003, were intended to assure the privacy and confidentiality of personal health information. However, HIPAA's privacy rules apply only to healthcare providers, payers and clearinghouses. Because the law does not directly apply to other parties that may obtain medical information (e.g., transcription companies and other hospital vendors), the regulations attempt to make hospitals responsible to take certain actions with regards to vendors to which a hospital provides medical information. HIPAA's privacy regulations require that if a hospital or other provider releases medical information to another person or entity to perform a function on the provider's behalf (the provider's "business associate"), the provider must enter into a "business associate" agreement requiring that the business associate maintain the confidentiality of that medical information. HIPAA's privacy regulations require that business associate contracts contain a number of different provisions. The contract must specify the permitted uses and disclosures of information by the business associate; and must require the business associate not to use or further disclose the information except as permitted by the contract, and to use appropriate safeguards to prevent use or disclosure of the information other than as allowed by the contract. The contract must also "ensure that any agents, including a subcontractor," to whom the business associate provides medical information "agrees to the same restrictions and conditions that apply to the business associate with respect to such information." The contract must authorize termination if the business associate violates a material term of the contract. In addition to HIPAA's privacy regulations, HIPAA's security regulations should be considered when contracting with a medical transcription company. Although the security regulations will not be effective until 2005, because the final security rule applies to electronic medical information (in storage or transmission), medical transcription vendors will be among those business associates covered by HIPAA's security rules. Similar to the privacy rule, HIPAA's security rule requires that hospitals enter into a contract with business associates who "create, receive, maintain or transmit electronic protected health information" that specifies how the business associate will protect that information. Additional security provisions will need to be added to business associate contracts with transcription vendors and other business associates that receive or transmit electronic information. For example, the security regulations require with regards to electronic medical information, that any business associate shall "(i) implement administrative, physical, and technical safeguards that reasonably and appropriately protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of electronic protected health information that it creates, receives, maintains or transmits on behalf of the covered entity, as required by the security standards, (ii) ensure that any agent, including subcontractors to whom the business associate provides such information, agrees to implement reasonable and appropriate safeguards to protect it, and (iii) report to the covered entity any security incident relating to the" electronic information that the vendor maintains for the hospital. Hospitals should therefore be asking their medical transcription vendors both about how the vendor maintains the privacy of medical information, and how the vendor safeguards the security of electronic information. This should include the following:
The obligation of a hospital and business associate to ensure confidentiality and security of information becomes more complicated if all of the parties receiving information are not located inside the United States. Entities not domiciled in the United States may not be subject to, or even aware of, U.S. laws. Following are some tips that a hospital can use when considering entering into a contract for medical transcription services, both to minimize the chance of a HIPAA or confidentiality violation, and to ensure that the hospital is able to take appropriate action with regards to a transcription service that may not be performing up to required standards.
A California state senator has discussed introducing legislation to prohibit provider and payer organizations in that state from sending confidential medical information outside of the United States for transcription or other outsourced data processing activities. Whether other states follow suit remain to be seen. In the meantime, hospitals can minimize the risk of transcription vendors treating information inappropriately by following certain common sense and legal guidelines, such as those set forth above. | |||